Excerpts from trial: US v. "TT" (01/14/00), Concord NH

(Forest Fee case; date of alleged offense: Nov. 6. 1999)

"TT" = Defendant

"JM" = Magistrate Judge Muirhead (presiding).

"FF" = Forest Service officer/witness who ticketed TT.

***************** *

[At beginning of the trial, JM advises TT of his right to remain silent: e.g., "You need not say anything to anyone in this matter," etc.]

FF [Describing process of ticketing someone and the form displayed at trailheads and/or to be left on cars, etc.]:

"That form says, 'Failure to deposit correct payment or to display a forest-wide parking pass violates 36 CFR 261.15 and may result in a fine not to exceed $100.'"

JM: 'Where in 36 CFR 261.15 does it say that failure to display a parking pass is a violation? I have been unable to find it."

[They look up 36 CFR 261.15.]

JM: [referring to the form referred to above by FF]: "It says, 'failure to deposit correct payment or to display a forest-wide parking pass violates CFR 261.15' and I asked, 'Where in CFR 261.15 it requires that any parking pass be displayed?'. FAILURE TO PAY is what the offense is."

[Having made this point, JM tells them to proceed. FF proceeds with his testimony about process of how cars are ticketed: FF checks to find who the car belongs to and then issues "probable cause statement", etc.]

[TT accepts offer to testify, and condemns the fees. Finally he is asked directly by the prosecutor if he was there on that date, saw the signs, and refused to pay. TT admits this.]

JM: "Mr. [TT], Unfortunately for the Forest Service, Congress has taken upon itself to underfund their needs. I, with you, think the Forest Service does a pretty outstanding job. But it becomes hard to provide the amenities and do their job when Congress provides inadequate funds.

"Congress permitted the adoption of this particular provision establishing fees for various uses, and I suppose you could argue with what the forest service has chosen is a reasonable fee or isn't - - $3 or not.

"But the fact of the matter is that it IS the law. I will tell you, had you chosen not to testify, I would have dismissed it. I told you you didn't have to; you did, and during your testimony you acknowledged to me that in fact you didn't pay the fee.

"But the difficulty here is this: there is nothing in that regulation that requires anybody to post anything on their automobile. And if the Forest Service wants to prove that somebody hasn't paid the fee, they're going to have to prove that there was no daily payment made, that there was no weekly payment made, and there was no season payment made. And if they fail to do that, they have not proved their case. And during the State's case they really haven't done that, so you sort of filled in the gaps.

"And without that, it does not establish probable cause in any single ticket. And I have been dismissing these left and right when people don't show up [in court], because they DON'T state probable cause, on the face of them, most of the time.

"But I have no choice, based on the evidence that I have heard, but to find you guilty under the evidence."

[The Prosecutor asked for a fine of $50 (and there is an automatic asssesment of $5). TT said he would not pay the $55. At some point here the court adjourned for a few minutes. TT was led out by the marshalls; JM went out of the courtroom. Court reconvened about 10-15 minutes later. JM asked, "Are we back on the record?" JM then outlined TT's various options: pay the $55, or else risk contempt-of- court charges, arrest, possible shipment to Oklahoma, etc. TT began to protest about his having been invited to tesify and express his opinions. JM broke in:]

JM: "The piece of evidence that was crucial to the government YOU supplied. They hadn't established that you hadn't paid the fee. YOU'RE the one that told me you didn't pay the fee. So I had no choice but to find you guilty. I told you you didn't have to testify. I can't tell you how to try your case!"

[TT finally agreed to pay the $55, and the trial ended with a back-and- forth exchange between JM and TT, in which JM noted that many people object to the fees and that he'd had alot of problems with them, "but I am neither the Congress, nor am I the Forest Service. I am just a judge ... I certainly would encourage you to write your congressmen, write the US Senators." He concluded by noting that the president had just designated alot of federal lands for protection, to be overseen by the Forest Service and the Park Service, but speculated that Congress wouldn't give them adequate money to do the job there, either.]

Trial ended.

***************** ********

These excerpts were privately transcribed from the official court audiotape, which was purchased from Federal District Court in Concord, NH.